Eight prospect queries, three LLMs, one share-of-voice report. We check whether your brand is named, where it ranks, what the sentiment is, and which competitors got cited in your place. Raw response excerpts included — no black box.
We don't run a generic 'AI presence' summary. We run the actual queries caregivers ask, against the actual platforms that answer them — then show you the raw text we got back, so you can audit the claim yourself.
ABA discovery is shifting from Google to ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity faster than the industry recognizes. The clinics getting cited in those answers will compound; the ones absent will quietly lose top-of-funnel.
Below 20% mention rate across these queries means you're effectively invisible to AI-mediated discovery. Above 50% means the entity-grounding work has compounded.
Being mentioned 4th in a list of 6 is meaningfully different from being mentioned 1st. Caregivers stop reading after the top 2-3 named providers.
If three competitors get named consistently and you don't, the work is structured-data + citation-building targeting the entities those competitors have. We can see the gap exactly.
If your mention rate is below 20%, the work is concrete: entity definition pages, schema markup, third-party citations. Walk this report through with us in 20 minutes and we'll scope the entity-grounding sprint.